Looper Imdb Inhaltsverzeichnis
Die Handlung dreht sich um den Killer Joe - einen Looper. Das sind die gut bezahlte Auftragskiller einer verbrecherischen Organisation in der. Looper (Film) – Wikipedia. Looper. ()IMDb 7,41 Std. 58 MinX-Ray In der Zukunft ist Zeitreise möglich. Das organisierte Verbrechen hat eine innovative Verwendung für die. This is Rick Stein's Kozani Chicken from his TV series Long Weekends. This Greek chicken dish is loaded with sweet prunes, fragrant saffron and smoky paprika. Jun 29, - Directed by Rian Johnson. With Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt, Paul Dano. In , when the mob wants to get rid of someone. Looper () - IMDb. Directed by Rian Johnson. With Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt, Paul Dano. In , when the mob wants to get rid of. The movie poster of Men at the Movies: Looper. In der Zukunft ist Zeitreise möglich. Das organisierte Verbrechen hat Imdb score: View movie on imdb /
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password. We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your account.
Just leave us a message here and we will work on getting you verified. As thought-provoking as it is thrilling, Looper delivers an uncommonly smart, bravely original blend of futuristic sci-fi and good old-fashioned action.
Rate this movie. Oof, that was Rotten. Meh, it passed the time. So Fresh: Absolute Must See! You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.
Cinemark Coming Soon. Regal Coming Soon. By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.
I found myself dreaming of the days when Willis would take a rest from Die Hard-ing to do character cameos of unexpected depth and pathos: Pulp Fiction, Nobody's Fool, and a few others.
Now he clings to stoic longevity, and shoots people. David Thomson. Yes, it's a B movie sci-fi thriller, but not many prestige pictures have this much going on underneath the surface.
Tom Charity. That first hour cooks. And the second hour brings Emily Blunt into the story, which is a fine thing for any second half to offer.
Michael Phillips. If the whole thing leaves you rubbing your temples, just a bit Stephen Whitty. The reasoning behind all this may not reward prolonged inspection, but Johnson is smart enough to press onward with his plot, leaving us with neither the time nor the desire to linger over the logic Anthony Lane.
Writer-director Rian Johnson establishes himself as an original talent who clearly believes storytelling must prevail.
Richard Roeper. Richard Propes. Fantastic performances, big ideas, and the ability to pull off a slick narrative juggling act. Brent McKnight. This is the kind of science fiction that can be seen multiple times.
Yasser Medina. If you pick too much around the edges of LOOPER, it will inevitably fray slightly, as do many intricate time travel yarns.
However, LOOPER is a layered and intelligent neo-noir science fiction with some striking images and emotional resonance. Jim Ross. Complex, entertaining yet brimming with intelligence, Looper needs to be watched - easily one of the smartest films this year.
Katie Smith-Wong. Rian Johnson, director of Brick and The Brothers Bloom, has bit off a big honkin' chunk of sci-fi mythology with Looper.
Leslie Combemale. Top Box Office. More Top Movies Trailers. Certified Fresh Picks. Black Mirror: Season 5.
Into The Dark: Season 2. Lovecraft Country: Season 1. The Mandalorian: Season 1. Saturday Night Live: Season Orphan Black: Season 5.
Watchmen: Season 1. The Walking Dead: Season Certified Fresh Pick. View All. Holiday Movie Guide Fall TV Halloween H20 Vs. Halloween Log in with Facebook.
Email address. Edit Looper Jump to: Summaries 3 Synopsis 1. The synopsis below may give away important plot points.
Edit page. Sci-Fi drama,action,mystery. Share this page:. Clear your history. It's refreshing to see a movie based on an original script, not an adaptation nor a remake.
Despite all the time travel elements, the film also doesn't feel too science-fiction-y. I'm also glad Johnson doesn't pile on one action set pieces after another, instead there are a lot of quiet moments to establish character development that help you get immersed in Joe's journey.
Final Thoughts: Looper is a thrill ride that has a nice blend of thrilling action and matters of the heart.
There are brutal action and some totally-unnecessary nudity here, but fortunately not so much so that derails my overall appreciation for it. At the core of this movie lies a heartfelt love story between a man and a woman, and also between a mother and his son.
Highly recommended. Looking for some great streaming picks? Check out some of the IMDb editors' favorites movies and shows to round out your Watchlist.
Visit our What to Watch page. Sign In. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates.
Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews.
Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Rate This. In , when the mob wants to get rid of someone, the target is sent into the past, where a hired gun awaits - someone like Joe - who one day learns the mob wants to 'close the loop' by sending back Joe's future self for assassination.
Director: Rian Johnson. Writer: Rian Johnson. Available on Amazon. Added to Watchlist. From metacritic. Dashiell Driscoll: Best of Anthony Breznican: Best of
In: 34th Annual Young Artist Awards. Writers Guild of America Award für das beste Originaldrehbuch. Der auf den ersten Blick etwas verwirrend anmutende Plot von "Looper" mag zwar wie so viele Zeitreisegeschichte bei näherem Hinsehen ein, zwei Lücken aufweisen, ist insgesamt aber dennoch durchaus clever durchdacht Jadran Malkovich bietet mit dem action-reichen Duell zwischen Bruce Willis und Joseph Gorden-Levitt durchgehend gute Unterhaltung. National Board of Review Award für South Park Kenny beste Originaldrehbuch [11]. Clear your history. Doch wann Arzu Bazman Ausstieg In Aller Freundschaft der Start auf Netflix? Broadcast Film Critics Association. Clear your history. All the best Rothaarige Schauspielerin travel movies have a consistency that holds the idea together. In the day and age of no heart films, torture porn and saccharine dramas we again have to endure the waste of time, resources and column space that a films like this garners. Drifters Season 2, to tie up loose ends and erase the evidence of his ever being a looper, Joe knows that one day his future self will be sent back for him to kill. Was this Die Bourne Verschwörung Stream helpful to you? So, Richard Sanderson his future self comes back, present-day self hesitates for a moment and future self gets the drop on him and runs off. It revolves around "present-day" contract killers called "loopers" hired by criminal syndicates Marijke Smitt the future to terminate victims Planet Erde Stream they send back through time. Ndr Sh Magazin Rian Johnson establishes himself as an original Das Geheimnis Der Hunters Folge 21 who clearly believes storytelling must prevail. The Undoing. And by cutting out the middlemen i. Put it this way. Retrieved March 10, Dezember Was sind wirklich gute Filme auf Netflix? This content is Braveheart Ganzer Film Deutsch for the entertainment of our users only. Nachdem die Vereinigten Staaten Looper Imdb Amerika von China wirtschaftlich überholt wurden, haben sich die sozialen Gegensätze und Spannungen weiter verschärft; im Jahr sind extreme Armut und Gewalt weitenteils an der Tagesordnung. Um den Loopern die Möglichkeit zu nehmen, ihre Auftraggeber in der Zukunft an die Behörden zu verraten, werden auch sie nach 30 Jahren zu ihrem jüngeren Selbst zurückgeschickt und von diesem eliminiert, was dem jüngeren Looper eine erhebliche zusätzliche Bezahlung in Gold einbringt. Der Zeitreisende zeigt dem Jüngeren eine Karte, auf der die drei möglichen Aufenthaltsorte des Regenmachers in der Captian Marvel verzeichnet sind. Aktuelle Gutscheine. Looper Imdb Movies / TV Video
Jungle Jail - ESMA 2007By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.
I found myself dreaming of the days when Willis would take a rest from Die Hard-ing to do character cameos of unexpected depth and pathos: Pulp Fiction, Nobody's Fool, and a few others.
Now he clings to stoic longevity, and shoots people. David Thomson. Yes, it's a B movie sci-fi thriller, but not many prestige pictures have this much going on underneath the surface.
Tom Charity. That first hour cooks. And the second hour brings Emily Blunt into the story, which is a fine thing for any second half to offer.
Michael Phillips. If the whole thing leaves you rubbing your temples, just a bit Stephen Whitty. The reasoning behind all this may not reward prolonged inspection, but Johnson is smart enough to press onward with his plot, leaving us with neither the time nor the desire to linger over the logic Anthony Lane.
Writer-director Rian Johnson establishes himself as an original talent who clearly believes storytelling must prevail.
Richard Roeper. Richard Propes. Fantastic performances, big ideas, and the ability to pull off a slick narrative juggling act. Brent McKnight.
This is the kind of science fiction that can be seen multiple times. Yasser Medina. If you pick too much around the edges of LOOPER, it will inevitably fray slightly, as do many intricate time travel yarns.
However, LOOPER is a layered and intelligent neo-noir science fiction with some striking images and emotional resonance. Jim Ross.
Complex, entertaining yet brimming with intelligence, Looper needs to be watched - easily one of the smartest films this year.
Katie Smith-Wong. Rian Johnson, director of Brick and The Brothers Bloom, has bit off a big honkin' chunk of sci-fi mythology with Looper. Leslie Combemale.
Top Box Office. More Top Movies Trailers. Certified Fresh Picks. Black Mirror: Season 5. Into The Dark: Season 2. Lovecraft Country: Season 1. The Mandalorian: Season 1.
Saturday Night Live: Season Orphan Black: Season 5. Watchmen: Season 1. The Walking Dead: Season Certified Fresh Pick.
View All. Holiday Movie Guide Fall TV Halloween H20 Vs. Halloween Log in with Facebook. Email address. Log In. First Name.
Last Name. By signing up, you agree to receiving newsletters from Rotten Tomatoes. You may later unsubscribe. Create your account Already have an account?
Email Address. Real Quick. We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your email. Please click the link below to receive your verification email.
Cancel Resend Email. Looper Add Article. Looper Critics Consensus As thought-provoking as it is thrilling, Looper delivers an uncommonly smart, bravely original blend of futuristic sci-fi and good old-fashioned action.
See score details. Rate And Review Submit review Want to see. Super Reviewer. Rate this movie Oof, that was Rotten.
What did you think of the movie? Step 2 of 2 How did you buy your ticket? Let's get your review verified. Fandango AMCTheatres.
More Info. Submit By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.
How did you buy your ticket? View All Photos Movie Info. In a future society, time-travel exists, but it's only available to those with the means to pay for it on the black market.
When the mob wants to eliminate someone, it sends the target into the past, where a hit man known as a looper lies in wait to finish the job. Joe Joseph Gordon-Levitt is one such hired gun, and he does his job well -- until the day his bosses decide to "close the loop" and send Joe's future self Bruce Willis back in time to be killed.
Rian Johnson. Ram Bergman , James D. Sep 1, Ram Bergman. Bruce Willis Old Joe. Joseph Gordon-Levitt Joe.
Emily Blunt Sara. Paul Dano Seth. Noah Segan Kid Blue. Piper Perabo Suzie. Jeff Daniels Abe. Unfortunately the film does neither of these plots well, and ends up ruining both.
To make matters worse, the film moves very slowly in certain places. This just gives the audience time to think about how bad the plot it is.
There is virtually no action either - unless you count Bruce Willis's character shooting defenseless toddlers for which the certificate should surely be more than 15 , or needless torture and execution scenes.
There is just a lot of running away from people taking badly aimed pot shots. This happens a lot. Apparently nobody can shoot straight in the future.
The only action scene worthy of the name comes in the last 5 minutes where Bruce Willis suddenly turns ninja and takes out ALL the bad guys in about 30 seconds, and then walks off.
It's almost as if the writers got to the end of the story and then thought, "Oh yeah - we should probably have Bruce Willis firing some guns or something They don't give good explanations about why time travel exists, or how it works.
Fair enough. There is a certain suspension of disbelief in any time travel movie. However, they DO establish certain rules about time travel during the film, which they then break, re-establish and break again whenever it is convenient for the writers.
Bruce Willis attempts to explain time travel, and give a justification for the writer's itinerant stance on the matter, only to then smash is hands on the table and angrily shout "It doesn't matter!
This makes it clear that the writers didn't even think they were being clever or original. They clearly knew the plot made no sense, and they were just making a pathetic excuse about time travel being "flaky" to justify their random plot lurches and inconsistencies.
The whole premise of a "Looper" was never satisfactorily explained: 1 Why did the mafia boss who supposedly "owned" the city live in a little basement?
In his pajamas? If a body disappears from the future, for example in a furnace, then surely it also disappears from the future in time travel?
Same difference. Asking for trouble. Surely the job wasn't that strenuous that they needed to take shifts? They broke their own rules on time travel, and made the ending of the film impossible and irrelevant given the events in the middle: As soon as the younger version shot himself at the end, then he couldn't have lived to meet the woman in China and eventually travel back in time, which means he couldn't have ever caused his past self to meet the rain man, and so the rain man would not be standing there in the corn field.
The rain man would have grown up and taken over the world in the same way he did before, and Bruce Willis's wife would still be dead.
They never actually explained WHY the first thing the rain man wanted to do was to kill the loopers in the future. Presumably it was because they were the only people who could go back in time and possibly stop him?
So why didn't he just kill them with telekinesis like he did the rest of his enemies? Why did he chose to kill them in the ONLY method which would actually give them the opportunity to stop him in the past - namely, by sending them back to the past, alive.
The story never really addressed or capitalized on Bruce Willi's character being evil. This could have been a great angle to really explore, but instead they just washed over it.
This film was a dismal train wreck of ideas with great potential. Turfseer 29 September The near universal critical acclaim for 'Looper' is something I'm having a hard time fathoming.
I suppose we haven't seen a great sci-fi thriller in such a long time, that as soon as a mediocre to average flick such as this one comes along, everyone is jumping on the bandwagon, practically calling it a masterpiece!
My first problem with 'Looper' is the overall concept. A crime syndicate in the future wants to dispose of its victims by sending them 30 years back into the past and have them disposed of by hit men, who they pay with bars of silver.
Once these hit men the loopers live their lives for thirty years, the syndicate decides to dispose of them by sending them back to , where they'll be disposed of, sometimes even by their younger selves.
It's explained that in the future bodies are 'tagged' so by sending them back in time, they cannot be traced. But why can't the syndicate send their victims in the present immediately back to 65 million B.
And by cutting out the middlemen i. Once we're introduced to the novelty of the how the looper scheme operates, the novelty soon wears off. We see Joe Joseph Gordon-Levitt traveling to the cornfield and then performing executions one too many times.
Finally, there's a plot twist: fellow looper Seth appears at Joe's apartment, explaining that his 30 year old self from the future appears in the cornfield and he's unable to finish the job.
Abe, the enforcer from the future, forces Joe to betray Seth, who's tortured and his alter ego from the future is hunted down.
You might ask what this has to do with time travel or science-fiction. Actually nothing--it's simply all action-thriller at this point in time in the script.
Soon, Joe finds himself in the same position as Seth. His 30 year old future self Bruce Willis appears but manages to prevent younger Joe from doing him in.
In a rather derivative idea borrowed from the 'Terminator' series, Willis must dispose of a child who will one day grow up to be the 'Rainmaker', the sinister figure in the future who is now bent on eliminating all the loopers.
It might have been interesting had we seen what this Rainmaker character looked and acted like in the future, but that never occurs.
We're asked to be content with meeting little Cid, our future Rainmaker, who has telekinetic powers coupled with a severe anger management problem.
One is immediately reminded of Billy Mumy in the Season 3 Twilight Zone episode, "It's a Good Life", who plays a mutant who terrifies adults by 'wishing them away to the cornfield'.
So the second half of 'Looper' feels much more like fantasy-horror than Sci-fi action thriller. The meeting between the younger and older Joes in the diner is perhaps the most interesting scene in the film as it underscores the contrast between the more impulsive younger self with the more seasoned, experienced older one.
Unfortunately, there is hardly any additional interaction between the two altar egos, with older Joe stalking off to blow away Abe and his crew of malevolent meanies.
In true Bruce Willis fashion, the aging 'Die Hard' legend, is up to his old tricks, by machine-gunning most of the bad guys, sans Kid Blue, who appears out of nowhere on his flying motorcycle and immediately gets himself killed, instead of Joe, who is his intended target.
If the Looper second half feels a bit slower than the first, that's because director Rian Johnson spends a little too much time out on the farm, with Joe courting Sara Emily Blunt.
Although there's a feeling that we've seen this before, the ending proves to be passable as we finally have something to feel good about.
Younger Joe sacrifices himself, preventing older Joe from killing Sara. He does this after he's able to foresee that Cid, growing up as the Rainmaker, will hold a perpetual grudge due to the murder of his mother and will take it out on all of humanity including all the loopers in the future.
Unfortunately, Joe's sacrifice, is not enough to make either young Joe or older Joe, likable. Younger Joe, before he takes his own life, is a criminal and a drug addict and older Joe, is responsible for murdering the second child on his list of three potential Rainmakers.
In terms of a sympathetic protagonists, there's little to like here at all. One feels that one is simply viewing a second hand set from 'Robocop'--in that film, 'Old Detroit' looks remarkably similar to Looper's Kansas City of including the grimy 'futuristic' cars and emphasis on vagrancy as a national blight.
The performances in Looper are all acceptable, with an honorable mention going to little Pierce Gagnon as Cid, who manages to handle a number of complicated lines and take direction in a fashion way above his chronological age.
In the end, Looper proves only mildly interesting. While some of the action sequences are entertaining, the sci-fi premise is not developed into something clever enough to deserve all the the accolades that have been heaped upon it to date.
I've been reading many reviews and the discussion boards on this site, and after just coming back from enjoying it, I was very disappointing to see so many negative reviews and comments.
I'm definitely going to be responding to some comments in the discussion boards from some specific details of the movie, but for now I will just write a review.
And a positive review since there is so many haters out there. Firstly I have to say I am a big fan of sci-fi and specifically time travel.
It takes a black-noir sort of character and puts him in the year , where time travel hasn't even been invented yet but eventually does and used by only secret criminal organizations.
These organizations seem to gather future "trash" and are disposed by loopers who are told to wait at a specific time and wait to pull the trigger.
Which so happens to be our protagonist who suspiciously reminds me of Max Payne. Now the kind of people that are sent back in time to be killed by "loopers" yes there is more than one , we are given no prior knowledge of who they were or what they have done.
What I really enjoyed was the fact of, what they considered is bad? Who deserved to die? Anyway we are given a few glimpses of how the rest of the city looks in this time and how a first world country in some parts, looks like a third world country in others.
People thrive on scraps, constantly stealing from one another and just surviving. While the rich are comfortable and most probably criminals or in some way affiliated with the crime land.
It's supposed to show how the world is brought down by it being run by criminal minds. People from the future who come from the past to make the past "better" and how these people are ignored for rich people to think of themselves.
Which was the point of the movie, because when you are talking about changing the future, do you want to change the future to make it better for you?
Or for the rest of the world? This would make more sense to people who have seen this movie, but for those of you that haven't, I just hope you don't read a lot of these "reviews" and decide not to "waste your money.
I can't finish this review without saying how great the cinematography of this film was. At time you could just feel how the character was feeling, when he was giving narrating sections while showing all he did was murder faceless people, over and over.
And he actually has plans, and start to care for who he is and what he becomes. I could probably talk about this movie all day, but I don't want this review to be a novel, so I'll finish it here but my main objective of this review is for people not to miss out on this great movie, as the acting is top notch and at some part comical, with a great new actor who is no older than 10!
How the director makes Joseph Levitt's character act like Bruce Willis and either Rian or Joseph does a great job depicting it, it's as if I was listening and watching Bruce Willis most of the film.
My biggest complaint was the action sequences when it came to gun play. I found it lazy how everyone shot at Bruce Willis but the bullets flew all around him.
There were times he took cover and I guess because his character is just smart enough he knows when to take cover and just shoot because the opponents he's dealing with are clumsy and inexperienced.
Anyway small complaint for a very well done film. Looper is one of those films that should be appreciated by its message more than its genre. Looper made a kill for it.
Looper is a film that goes to extraordinary lengths to leave every base covered in its quest to avoid plot holes and inconsistencies and in my mind it deals with the problems associated with time travel very well.
One thing I liked is that the older Joe is aware of everything the younger Joe is about to do which gives him an edge if they were to do battle.
I also liked that the older Joe in true Bruce Willis style bypasses the whole idea of trying to work out how and why what is happening is happening by saying he can't be bothered to work it all out.
As well as the older Joe having the advantage of memory over the younger Joe, the younger Joe in turn has his own advantages which become apparent.
There were several times when I thought I'd worked out what was going to happen or what a particular character's arc was going to be but the film cleverly manipulates its audience, leading them down alleyways only to jump out at them from behind and spin them around.
There is a nice early twist which gave me a smile and plenty more to keep you guessing right the way to the end.
In the end it turns out that time travel plays second fiddle to another phenomenon which I was pleased by as there was no mention of this in the trailer which I've been trying to avoid for several weeks.
The plot is multifaceted with each character having their own reasons for being where they are, when they are and doing what they are doing.
It is a dense plot which explores several different ideas and concepts both personal and scientific. Cities have continued to expand upwards and outwards but they themselves are filled with tent cities in which a large vagrant class live.
Life is cheap and hard in this world in which the have's and have not's are much more separated than today. There is enough in the film to make to world feel as though it is our near future and the technology on display feels as though it is a few logical steps along the road.
I especially liked the ingenious solution to running cars after the inevitable the oil crisis and there's also a great line about China in there which had a lot of people laughing.
The writing and direction are superb but another strength are the acting performances. Joseph Gordon-Levitt wears heavy makeup and prosthetics to make him look more like Bruce Willis and although this is occasionally a little distracting, it looks unnervingly good at times, especially closer up which is odd.
The effect is actually better in close up than when JG-L is in the middle distance. Underneath the prosthetics though Gordon-Levitt delivers a fine performance, adopting a few of Willis' telltale mannerisms and affectations but avoiding pure mimicry.
He appears confident and at ease in the dense lead role, carrying off a mixture of hard edged killer and caring young man while switching from one to the other with ease.
Bruce Willis equally is very good but we have seen this kind of performance from him many times before.
Nevertheless he is on good form here. The chemistry between the two leads was great and really helped with the believability of them being one person.
Emily Blunt was another actor who performed very well and in a departure from her more familiar roles. She adopts a convincing American accent, drops a few F-Bombs and looks comfortable holding a gun.
She brings to the fore the feminine caring side when it matters though. Probably the standout actor though despite the three A Listers is Pierce Gagnon, a very young child actor who is incredible in a pivotal role.
He and Gordon-Levitt have some funny and tense scenes together which work very well. Overall there was little I didn't like about Looper and it has gone straight into my Top 10 films of the year so far as well as being probably my favourite Sci-Fi since 's Moon.
It treats its audience with respect and isn't afraid to keep you them of the loop for a while as it teases them with false and sometimes seemingly false information.
It is well designed and acted and features a wonderfully multifaceted and intelligent story which rewards patience and concentration with a fantastic ending.
This story was written by someone who does not comprehend even the basics of time travel problems and paradoxes. It is a mystery why this chaos received so high grades.
The plot in short: mafia from the future sends their assassination targets into the present to be disposed of; in the present there are killers, so called loopers organized by a sadist from the future who await their targets and kill them.
Before or later, the looper receives a mission to kill his future self. Some of them fail to do so. And then the chase begins. First of all, the premise is pretty stupid, to use such advanced technology for such mundane goal.
In the movie they have explained, that in the future it is impossible to get rid of someone without being tracked. It is, as it seems, far easier to build a time machine then to avoid tracking technology from a collapsed society.
Then we have a pretty horrifying and illogical scene of punishment for a failed looper. His present self is mutilated and his future self loses his limbs one by one.
This is wrong, all his wounds have been inflicted in the past so they would appear all at once in the future. And it is unresolved if his present self has been killed or will they keep him alive for the next few decades without his limbs, until he is sent into the present.
Terminator-Joe from the future does not have exact information about Rainmaker, only his date of birth and he manages to narrow his search to only three kids he will have to kill.
He eliminates two targets and of course, his past self protects the real Rainmaker, the fact that it HAS TO BE KNOWN to his future self even before his trip to the past, because it is past, no matter when the audience has find out this.
Then the Terminator-Joe eliminates his entire ex- gang and there is a showdown between him, his present-self and the Rainmaker-Kid.
The situation is resolved when the present Joe kills himself and the Terminator-Joe disappears. Which would set in motion time traveling paradox: Terminator Joe does not exist so he cant be sent into the past and all his actions would be reversed.
But no, all his actions in the movie remain. The Rainmaker-kid survives and he will grow up not to be mafia boss but exemplary member of future society.
The end. Oh, and this Rainmaker-kid has a Carrie-like telekinetic abilities, which has nothing to do with a plot and is complete superficial.
As for the pacing of the movie, it is horrible. Then we have a final shoot out. All in all a very bad experience, caused by a fanboy-hype.
Looper seems like it's inspired by Philip K. Dick's several works. It's a Sci-Fi story that is set in the future with a quite interesting concept. The ads shows this as a typical nonstop action film.
Surprisingly, it's much better than anyone would expect. It's actually a mind blowing film that tells an unpredictable story and has a great amount of thrills.
The performances are strong and the directing is solid. Unlike most modern Sci-Fi films they depend on the action and the explosions.
Looper is all about letting the audience intrigue all the way on the concept. The important thing you should expect in this film is the brilliance of the concept than the action.
Yeah, there's fighting and gunfights but it's mostly about the idea. The film tells it in a stylish and mind boggling way which makes it compelling.
The story development is clever. The first half lets the viewers root for the film's world until the plot twists. It's great when a scene suddenly becomes confusing then it all make sense afterwards.
Aside of its storytelling, Joseph Gordon-Levitt did a great job playing the young version of Bruce Willis as he imitates Willis' accent and gruffness.
He still plays the role with his own style. Gordon-Levitt is energetic and striking. The rest of the cast are excellent. The production design is decent.
Its futuristic world looks magnificent and their weaponry looks awesome. The camera-work is one of the merits of the film. It makes the action look stylish and brings cool vertigo to the trippy moments.
Every shot of the film is impressive. The most interesting one is when Joe was in the fields, you prominently see a cloud trail on the sky remarking the scene.
The script is smart enough for explaining its concept and making things gripping. Looper is one of those films that would stuck in your head in a long time because it's plain brilliant.
It's so different to popular modern Sci-Fi films. This film is not an action movie cookie-cutter that leaves the high concept as the background of the film.
This film simply narrates, mind-bends, and intrigues which makes it amazingly interesting. The idea is original with some inspiration. Looper has the art, the heart, the tension, and the brains that any science fiction fans would love.
To begin, Looper is a sci-fi film set in the future, dealing with the implications of time-travel, although it is very much a film about the past.
The film is all about the past, how it affects the present and the future and how it drives people with the majority of the film building characters and establishing plot.
Anyone looking for an action film will be sorely disappointed because this is first and foremost a writer's film, focusing on plot, character and dialogue.
As mentioned above, the brunt of the film falls on development, more so than action set-pieces and CGI. The portions of the city and the near future Johnson has created, whilst some may see as unoriginal, I see as tributary.
A lawless country split socially in half, poverty on one side, excess on the other, the world Johnson has manufactured carries an air similar to that of Alfonso Cuaron's Children of Men, a comparably important sci-fi film in the struggle to build the credibility of the genre in the realm of modern cinema.
Not only is the film intelligent, it also acts as a courier for Johnson, a director of hit Brick and miss The Brothers Bloom repute following his sophomore outing.
If you support intelligent science fiction in the intellectual vein of Inception and Primer, Looper is a film sitting firmly in the middle of the two.
Break the box office with this film and bring intelligence back to film-making. The premise for this film is fantastic, the cast appears great, and its a movie that wants to be seen.
However, it is a major disappointment. The whole concept of hit men and time-travel is intriguing- and the concept of your future self being the target, even more so, but this, in truth, is not what the film ends up being about.
In a Terminator esque manner Bruce Willis turns his antics in the past to a 'save the future' kill quest wanting to destroy a future-crushing "rainmaker" whom we know very little about and have little incentive to want killed whilst he is still a child.
The aforementioned has 'TK'- the films terms for Telekentic powers- and this is barely covered and feels like one idea too far, almost an add on that is ultimately crucial to the narrative but is not presented to us enough.
In all the film leaves you dissatisfied, feels clunky, and disappointing as on paper it could have been so much better.. Rian Johnson fiction film as it contains no science Looper should be the line in the sand to say enough.
Cinema going has turned into such a trite state that a film like this could be critically acclaimed and mass released. In the day and age of no heart films, torture porn and saccharine dramas we again have to endure the waste of time, resources and column space that a films like this garners.
At a time when other worthwhile films slip into obscurity of small openings and DVD bargain bins. Looper commits the most atrocious of cinematic crimes it abuses the viewers trust in a way that even Von Trier would be embarrassed by in all his emotion manipulation.
Looper's first thirty minutes run by smoothly. It appears self-assured, paced confidently and even though the science and exposition is at best first grader and a worst lazy film- making we can forgive all of this and just go with it.
Taking in the sub-standard portrayal of the future with none of the background social commentary of other genre films. Apart from some lazy shorthand referencing Doretha Lang's depression photograph of Mother With Seven Children replaced with future vagrant mother and child leaving behind any social cause and effect.
We feel we are getting to the meat of the story instead we find derivative shoot-outs, chases and uncompelling dialogue. At this point it all falls apart and the film runs into the dangerous space that modern cinema is not only touching on but beginning to permanently occupy.
The portrayal of females in the film is typical of the misogynistic movement in modern America's cinema.
Women are passive objects to be both lusted and tortured. In Lopper all the women portrayed are Whores or Junkies or have a perverse struggle with motherhood.
Emily Blunt's character is given a back-story from a daytime drama. She shown to have no motivation apart from giving into compulsion.
Any chance at positive female representation is at utter loss when she makes an-out-of nowhere unconvincing booty call with her child's adapted frog toy to Young Joe.
This scene is complete with ridiculously out of place romantic piano score. One gets the feeling the film-makers have misogynist issues that should have been worked out in therapy and not in celluloid.
Before all of this trite we get Bruce Willis's terrible act of killing a child an act in cinema that Hitchcock in his conversations with Truffaut remarked is a guaranteed way to lose an audience.
It has been done with a level of respect in films such as Afflecks Gone Baby Gone. In Looper it is unforgivable not only because of the act, but also in the way Johnson manipulates the audience and scenario for maximum effect making him parallel with pushers of Torture Porn.
We are asked to believe that a child straight off a Disney set walks into the wrong film and towards a pretty suburb home, which is unguarded, in this state of societal collapse and mass crime.
All this is for effect so when Old Joe shoots him we are more shocked, more horrified It is one of the more distasteful and undoubtedly manipulative scenes in recent cinema.
At the midway point the films personality splits, and it turns into a horror film about telekinetic abilities? In what seems like a pinned on sub-plot brought to the fore because they didn't know how to end the film.
The ending of self-sacrifice was a laughable attempt at catharsis. This infantile film should be laughed off the screens, especially given the sub-standard performances, Emily Blunts failure at acting in the miming smoking scene comes to mind,.
Critics drawing positive attention even with the quip that it entertains should be ashamed. The role of the critic should be to enlighten.
To shine a light towards the possibly unseen both within popular entertainment films and the unseen films that push the art form forwards. Rollum 12 October The whole premise of this story was flawed from the beginning.
For SciFi fans time travel is what its all about. Its meant to be intriguing and full of conundrums that most importantly, some how make sense.
All the best time travel movies have a consistency that holds the idea together. This is precisely what Loopers does not have.
There where so many holes in the plot that it became impossible to go with it. If your going to beam someone to the past to be killed why do you need a Looper.
And if you have to use a Looper why rely on him to kill himself - let someone else do it. Seriously this was just a few of the canyon like proportions of the gaps in the plot of this flop.
If Bruce was not in this i would have walked way before the end. I was fooled. You don't have to be. TheSquiss 25 September Time travel films open up all manner of questions because of the paradoxes every action and reaction produce.
Alas, to avoid dishing out hugely unpopular plot spoilers I need to skirt around the concerns, so you'll just have to come round with cake and we can discuss it in private.
But there are some pretty substantial issues with Looper that cause questions to be asked and lead to more than a couple of possible explanations as to what exactly is going on.
Don't see it alone; you'll need a friend around to discuss it on the journey home. Equally, don't be put off. However, when a looper's contract is up, they find themselves blowing the brains out of their older self.
Except when looper Joe Joseph Gordon-Levitt stares down the barrel at a version of himself that is thirty years older, Old Joe Bruce Willis outsmarts him and so begins a cat and mouse chase where there are multiples of each species and most of them aren't called Joe.
Don't think any more or you'll confound yourself with your wondering and wandering along all the possible flows and tributaries that lead from them.
Like, Is he actually I'm sure you can work out from the subject matter that there are occasional murders so I'm giving nothing away by stating that a particular murder in cuts against the rules.
It's not a major problem in terms of enjoyment but it does cast a shadow over everything if minor errors are not avoided. There's only one way to watch Looper: suspend all disbelief, put your logic in stasis and get on with enjoying the romp.
With that frame of mind employed, it's a superb film. No, it's not as intelligent a film as Inception, but it kicks the ass of Wanted and Gordon-Levitt is potentially a bigger star in the making than either Leonardo DiCaprio or James McAvoy.
I'm not sure that I buy Gordon-Levitt as a young Willis but the transition is simple and effectively executed and it needn't stand in the way of a couple of hours of great entertainment.
He's matured as an actor and, though he's been stamping around Hollywood for a good couple of decades, it's the last five years or so that have really seen him ascend the ranks and there's no sign of his climb slowing with both Spielberg's Lincoln and Don Jon's Addiction which he also wrote and directed in the can and Premium Rush earning plaudits on both sides of the Atlantic.
Ich entschuldige mich, aber meiner Meinung nach lassen Sie den Fehler zu. Es ich kann beweisen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden reden.
Entschuldigen Sie bitte, dass ich Sie unterbreche.